Managing Personal Finances: Budgeting, Spending, Banks, Loans, & Credit

Coriolanus

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
8,592
Subscriptor++
Here's the aforementioned yearly sankey chart for my yearly spending, representing every dollar I spent in 2024. Categories that are under are in green and yellow is over. It's a pretty good defence of frugality haha. I don't really monitor my spending, but I do total it at the end of each month.

My yearly notional budget is $28k, so I'm under. The "Fun" category is really just discretionary spending, I should probably separate out home repairs. BigTicket is a bit of a fail, it means I was lazy on my reno. Last year I spent about 10k on the reno.
View attachment 125294
Out of curiosity - how are you making the Sankey charts? Are they based on manually compiled data?
 

FinallyAnAccount

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,494
Subscriptor
Out of curiosity - how are you making the Sankey charts? Are they based on manually compiled data?
The Sankey charts are made here, the interface is pretty sweet! https://sankeymatic.com/build/

I've got an ancient MS Access database (I know!) that I made 25-30 years ago with VBA (i KNOW!) routines/queries that import/categorize OFX/QFX files (allowing overrides), so I can run arbitrary/monthly/yearly reports. So every month I spend about 10 minutes importing files. Generally there's a primary category (which the Sankey is based on) and a sub-category, sorta like 1Fun, 2Dining.
 

phoenix_rizzen

Ars Praefectus
4,867
Subscriptor
Ahhh, somehow thought it was less but yup, Excel has 1 million rows!

Maybe I do all my transactions in pennies?! ;)
Excel had a limit of 65,536 rows for many, many, many years. Back when Quattro Pro would advertise 1 million+ rows. [Edit: I think Quattro Pro's file size was only limited by the amount of RAM available.]

It wasn't until Excel 2003 or maybe even later that they expanded the number of rows beyond 65,536. Maybe with OOXML/.XLSX file format?
 
Last edited:

cwbecker

Ars Praefectus
5,857
Subscriptor
Excel had a limit of 65,536 rows for many, many, many years. Back when Quattro Pro would advertise 1 million+ rows.

It wasn't until Excel 2003 or maybe even later that they expanded the number of rows beyond 65,536. Maybe with OOXML/.XLSX file format?
It was after Excel 2003. I know because the AS/400 I used to admin would only accept .xls files in the 2003 format (not xlsx), and I regularly had to break up files for upload into 65k rows per file.
 

Vince-RA

Ars Praefectus
5,316
Subscriptor++
Depends on your work computer, I suppose. There are days it's an effort for it to open Teams.
Not sure what would make you say that.... ;)

1768421925089.png
 

Drizzt321

Ars Legatus Legionis
33,331
Subscriptor++
A couple of years ago my company published the total assets of their 401k plan, and the number of active participants, and I found the exact number of employees elsewhere. My estimate (exponential decay/zipfs law) was that I was very likely in the top 5 savers in a company with hundreds of employees and that many people had only trivial amounts in their 401k accounts.

There was a recent article saying that there are very few people at the "average". A few people really hammer a significant percentage of their salary over many years bring the average way up. The median is much lower. Varies by age, but avg vs median is insane.

View attachment 126222
https://www.empower.com/the-currency/life/average-401k-balance-age
Welp, since my employer has 401k at Empower, guess my balance is dragging the average upwards. That's nice to see! Maxing out 401k for the last several years really is helping that.

I think next year (have some things this year), I should start a regular Roth, post-tax dollars, so I could have a mix of taxed & untaxed retirement withdrawals.
 

Vince-RA

Ars Praefectus
5,316
Subscriptor++
My estimate (exponential decay/zipfs law) was that I was very likely in the top 5 savers in a company with hundreds of employees and that many people had only trivial amounts in their 401k accounts.
As a fairly recent hire at $current_job, I have <$100k in my 401k, but many times that in rollover IRAs managed separately. It seems like there must be a lot of people like me who muddy up the stats...unless people really roll over money from one job's 401k to the next?
 

Drizzt321

Ars Legatus Legionis
33,331
Subscriptor++
As a fairly recent hire at $current_job, I have <$100k in my 401k, but many times that in rollover IRAs managed separately. It seems like there must be a lot of people like me who muddy up the stats...unless people really roll over money from one job's 401k to the next?
That's actually what I have done. Although perhaps I should consider rolling over into a separate account that's only under my control. Hrm.
 
unless people really roll over money from one job's 401k to the next?
You say that like there's a downside.... I did this when I switched jobs a while back. Seems convenient. Am I missing something?

EDIT: Reading about it, I discovered that you can roll your Rollover IRA back into a 401k. Reasons listed for wanting to do this: preparing for a mega backdoor Roth conversion and accessing your money more easily if you retire early. Both of which seem like things people here might be interested in.
 
Last edited:

timezon3

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,215
Subscriptor
As a fairly recent hire at $current_job, I have <$100k in my 401k, but many times that in rollover IRAs managed separately. It seems like there must be a lot of people like me who muddy up the stats...unless people really roll over money from one job's 401k to the next?
Same here. My current employer (of 4 years) uses Empower, but all my previous employers used Fidelity. There's no way I'm rolling out of Fidelity into Empower.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vince-RA

diabol1k

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,720
Moderator
You say that like there's a downside.... I did this when I switched jobs a while back. Seems convenient. Am I missing something?

EDIT: Reading about it, I discovered that you can roll your Rollover IRA back into a 401k. Reasons listed for wanting to do this: preparing for a mega backdoor Roth conversion and accessing your money more easily if you retire early. Both of which seem like things people here might be interested in.
Aside from the Roth piece, not all 401(k)s are created equal - particularly in terms of investment options. IRAs tend to give a ton more flexibility on that front and there isn't really any benefit to having the money in a 401(k) with limited investment options vs an IRA where you can invest in wtfever (excepting if you're planning a conversion).
 

Vince-RA

Ars Praefectus
5,316
Subscriptor++
You say that like there's a downside.... I did this when I switched jobs a while back. Seems convenient. Am I missing something?
Historically I have had far better investment choices available with IRA custodians like Fidelity than I did at my 401k. Even now when my 401k is also hosted with Fidelity, I can invest in virtually whatever I want in my IRA, but I still have a limited set of funds to choose from in my 401k. There might have been a time where working at a big company gave you access to low expense funds that you might not have been able to invest in privately, but it seems like those days are long past.

I could see backdoor conversions and/or accessing money during early retirement being compelling reasons to roll into current 401k, though.
 

rain shadow

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,442
Subscriptor++
Aside from the Roth piece, not all 401(k)s are created equal - particularly in terms of investment options. IRAs tend to give a ton more flexibility on that front and there isn't really any benefit to having the money in a 401(k) with limited investment options vs an IRA where you can invest in wtfever (excepting if you're planning a conversion).
My 401k plan recently enabled the SDBA/PCRA thing, so I can invest in pretty much anything except leveraged stuff like options.
 

rain shadow

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
6,442
Subscriptor++
It’s been a decade since I was working with 401(k) plans professionally, but at the time that was a pretty rare arrangement - maybe one in twenty plans if my memory is accurate.
At least a few of the big ones offer it. ADP, Empower, Fidelity, probably many others.
It is up to the company/plan itself as to whether it is enabled or not. Mine didn't enable it until 2025.
 

Skoop

Ars Legatus Legionis
33,268
Moderator
I still have a limited set of funds to choose from in my 401k. There might have been a time where working at a big company gave you access to low expense funds that you might not have been able to invest in privately
When we were working, Mrs. Skoop's HR manager chose the fiduciary for their company 401ks when they were establishing the program. Said manager was financially illiterate.

All the funds were actively managed with expense ratios that made John Bogle spin in his grave.
 

MilleniX

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
7,811
Subscriptor++
When we were working, Mrs. Skoop's HR manager chose the fiduciary for their company 401ks when they were establishing the program. Said manager was financially illiterate.

All the funds were actively managed with expense ratios that made John Bogle spin in his grave.
Probably in an era when kickbacks and personal inducements from the custodian to the company and the relevant executive were even more common and acceptable than they are today. Has ERISA even been amended to ban those sorts of grift, yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: concernUrsus
Aside from the Roth piece, not all 401(k)s are created equal - particularly in terms of investment options. IRAs tend to give a ton more flexibility on that front and there isn't really any benefit to having the money in a 401(k) with limited investment options vs an IRA where you can invest in wtfever (excepting if you're planning a conversion).
And you can often get incentives for opening/funding an IRA.

Example: Merrill Edge/Bank of America is currently offering $600* for moving $200k+ of IRA there (and lower incentives for lower amounts). Normally no fees, and once linked - the IRA assets count toward your BoA Preferred Rewards customer bonuses. At the $100k+ "Platinum" level, Preferred Rewards status means a 75% bonus on credit card cash back (plus some other generally irrelevant things)

How it works, simple version: The generic "Unlimited" cash back card offers 1.5% cash back on all purchases, no limits. At Platinum customer level, you're getting 2.625% cash back anywhere on all purchases.

If you don't mind playing categories, you can get the "Custom Cash" card with a base 3% back in the category of your choice, which becomes 5.25%. Note that there's a cap of $2,500 spend per quarter for the 3%/5.25% cash back.

*It varies. I've seen $1000 before at ME, but that generally requires already having BoA status. Not always. Or go somewhere else for other incentives.
 
When we were working, Mrs. Skoop's HR manager chose the fiduciary for their company 401ks when they were establishing the program. Said manager was financially illiterate.

All the funds were actively managed with expense ratios that made John Bogle spin in his grave.
As I mentioned before, I managed to get our 401k provider to offer lower cost funds by writing them a letter and pointing out their fiduciary duty - and showing how equivalent mutual funds could be had for a MUCH lower expense ratio.

Not that they admitted I was the reason, but the timing was spot on.
 

hanser

Ars Legatus Legionis
43,010
Subscriptor++
OT1H: So January was the first month in 3? 4? years that monthly cashflow hasn't covered expenses. Not a huge surprise -- while daycare was a higher baseline monthly spend, post daycare is a lot more lumpy -- due to school schedules and whatnot, we pay for a lot of summer camp (mostly deposits) and almost all of our yearly travel in January. I did not anticipate the degree to which that would be the case a few years ago! So we moved a small amount of money from savings backwards into the checking account.

Not a great feeling, but absolutely 0th world problems.

OTOH: I started tracking NW in July of last year. Despite taking this teensy step backwards, the liquid NW is up by more than our net income for January. It's a weird thing to observe, because it's so abstract and disconnected from day-to-day reality. But it's also a nice "Shut up, idiot" reality check when I'm like "ehh what a terrible financial month".

Ironically, it's the abstract stuff that matters more than the day-to-day details.
 

timezon3

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,215
Subscriptor
OT1H: So January was the first month in 3? 4? years that monthly cashflow hasn't covered expenses. Not a huge surprise -- while daycare was a higher baseline monthly spend, post daycare is a lot more lumpy -- due to school schedules and whatnot, we pay for a lot of summer camp (mostly deposits) and almost all of our yearly travel in January. I did not anticipate the degree to which that would be the case a few years ago! So we moved a small amount of money from savings backwards into the checking account.

Not a great feeling, but absolutely 0th world problems.

OTOH: I started tracking NW in July of last year. Despite taking this teensy step backwards, the liquid NW is up by more than our net income for January. It's a weird thing to observe, because it's so abstract and disconnected from day-to-day reality. But it's also a nice "Shut up, idiot" reality check when I'm like "ehh what a terrible financial month".

Ironically, it's the abstract stuff that matters more than the day-to-day details.
We've been tracking our net worth (monthly) for several years. It is weird how dissociated it is from the actual "what did we make / spend this month".
 

flere-imsaho

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,842
Subscriptor
For those of you with young kids, I wanted to share that I am learning through experience that the biggest benefit of 529 accounts is not (was not) the tax advantage when you put the money in, nor the tax advantage when you pull the money out, but the tax advantage of not having to liquidate other investments when it comes time to pay the colleges in question.

I'm sure this varies depending on one's individual financial situation, so let's say ours is where our one salary covers expenses (basically), so college is being paid by liquidating RSUs and other taxable investments (it's complicated). If we had funded our 529s much more (unclear if we could have, but if), we'd be in a more advantaged tax situation.